Blog Directory CineVerse: January 2014

No CineVerse meeting on Jan. 29

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Due to the moderator's longer than expected recovery from surgery, CineVerse will again be cancelled on Wed., Jan. 29. We will reschedule "The Red Violin" for a later date.

Read more...

No CineVerse meeting on Jan. 22

Sunday, January 19, 2014

CineVerse will not meet on Wednesday, Jan. 22 due to the moderator's unavailability. We will reconvene on Jan. 29 with "The Red Violin."

Note that the film originally scheduled for Jan. 15, "Searching for Sugar Man," will be rescheduled for a forthcoming date in March.

Read more...

Waitresses have more fun (or do they?)

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Yesterday, CineVerse took a trip in the wayback machine to the mid 1970s, a time of maturation in Hollywood movies and daring new visions from bold young filmmakers, including Martin Scorsese. His "Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore" provoked an absorbing discussion among our members. Here's a recap:


WHAT IS CURIOUS, DIFFERENT AND DISTINCTIVE ABOUT THIS PICTURE?
It’s a departure for director Martin Scorsese, well known for making tough guy movies and mob films; this film showcases his versatility and sensitivity in bringing out good drama, comedy and strong performances from females, kids and a well-written script.
The film is an interesting blend of different genres, including drama, romantic comedy, road movie, and woman’s picture.
The story and characters are not easy to predict: the film doesn’t necessarily conclude the way most would expect, and the ending is unresolved and ambiguous, although emotionally you could argue there is some closure by the finish.
The movie is well cast, including heavyweights like Ellyn Burstyn (who won Best Actress Oscar), Diane Ladd (nominated for her role), Kris Kristofferson (in a role that put him on the map), Harvey Keitel, and future stars in Jodie Foster and even Diane Ladd’s daughter Laura Dern. Alfred Lutter, who plays the son, is also impressive as a precocious 12-year-old.

THE MOVIE HAS HAILED AS A FEMINIST PICTURE BY SOME, AND CRITICIZED AS NOT ENOUGH OF A FEMINIST STATEMENT BY OTHERS. HOW DOES THIS MOVIE SUCCEED AND FAIL AS A FEMINIST FILM?
It has the appearance of a feminist film, with a strong female protagonist, yet it depicts her as needing the love and attention of a man and possibly failing in her dream of becoming a singer/entertainer.
The film was interestingly timed, as it was released at the height of the women’s rights movement, when feminist issues seeped into politics and culture.
While some have viewed the film as a feminist film that is positive and supportive in showcasing a woman’s transformation from a symbol of domesticity to a figure of autonomy, others have criticized it for being a glorified melodrama/romcom wherein the female lead can only find happiness and fulfillment by having a man.
As Roger Ebert put it: “The movie has been both attacked and defended on feminist grounds, but I think it belongs somewhere outside ideology, maybe in the area of contemporary myth and romance. There are times, indeed, when the movie seems less about Alice than it does about the speculations and daydreams of a lot of women about her age, who identify with the liberation of other women but are unsure on the subject of themselves.”
Consider that Alice doesn’t necessarily realize her dreams of becoming a singer by the end, and that she pours on the tears in an earlier scene to evoke pity from a bar owner; this not some Betty Friedan, bra-burning feminist icon. Instead, Alice has faults and flaws just like any woman or man. And she decides to remain in Tucson and near David instead of pursuing her dream of going to Monterey and becoming established as a singer there.
Consider, as well, the opening scene, with its sepia tones and iconic images we’ve seen in classic Hollywood films. This appears to be a spoof of the Hollywood dream vision that many young girls are fed and led to believe can happen to them.

WHAT ARE THE THEMES EXAMINED IN “ALICE”?
The complex differences between women and men, as exemplified in Alice’s relationships with the opposite sex.
Arguably, the most important of these relationships is not between Alice and her boyfriends but between Alice and her pre-teen boy, who stands alone with her at the end of the film, as if suggesting that they’ve come to some sort of an agreement and reached a bond, despite facing a fork in the road ahead.
Interestingly, she admits later in the movie that she cannot live without a man. It’s telling that, in the last shot, the only male she’s left standing with is her son, which underscores his importance in her life as the only real male that matters.
Scorsese told one interviewer: “It was a film about self-responsibility and also about how people make the same mistakes again and again.”
In another interview, Scorsese said the film is not about Alice and her career, but instead is concerned with particular real characters living in confusion. Essayist Russell Davis posited: “For this reason, the picture ends with Alice and Tommy on the verge of a total mutual understanding, a necessary preliminary to their successful coping with the world’s chaos.”

DOES THIS MOVIE REMIND YOU OF ANY OTHERS?
An Unmarried Woman
The Courtship of Eddie’s Father
Gas Food Lodging
Tumbleweeds

Waitress

Read more...

Alice through the looking glass

Sunday, January 12, 2014

It inspired a hit TV show (and a popular slogan, "kiss my grits") and diversified the repertoire of a bold young filmmaker who went on to achieve great things. On January 15, make your plans to attend CineVerse for “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore” (1974; 112 minutes), directed by Martin Scorsese, chosen by David Ries.

Read more...

Making waves

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Lars Von Trier's "Breaking the Waves" proved to be an arresting study of the power of love, with impressive performances and candid carnality. A recap of our group discussion of this picture follows:

WHAT IS SURPRISING AND UNEXPECTED ABOUT BREAKING THE WAVES?
·       The frankness and honesty with which it depicts and addresses sexual situations between two lovers and related to a woman’s will and desire.
·       The length: this is a 160-minute picture broken up into many different chapters; the chapters are introduced with 60s and 70s pop music that was likely chosen to inform and emotionally color the ensuing episode.
·       The look: the film adopts a cinema verite style by employing handheld camera; it enhances a rough, real-world worn appearance by being shot on film, transferring the image to video, then transferring the picture back to film, creating a grainy, imperfect visual with muted colors.
·       The disturbing content and violence depicted, especially near the ending: the visuals can be shocking and haunting, but they’re meant to make a strong impression.
·       The tone: the ending can be seen as depressing or uplifting, depending on how you interpret what was gained or lost.

WHAT ARE THE MAJOR THEMES THAT LARS VON TRIER AND THE FILMMAKERS ATTEMPT TO EXPLORE IN THIS MOVIE?
·       The challenges of being a woman in a patriarchal society that expects its females to be submissive, pure, and “good.”
·       The hypocritical nature and double standard ethic of patriarchal society, whereby men get away with many things and enjoy many more freedoms than women do.
·       How women are often trapped between two expected roles: the whore and the virgin.
·       Bess also plays as a sacrificial Christ-like figure who must give her body for her beloved’s salvation; and as a Mary Magdalene or Joan of Arc-like symbol, too.
·       The film challenges the viewer to question Bess’ motivation for acting the way she does after her husband’s accident: does she feel guilty and obligated to carry out his wishes? Does she believe that it will save his life and that it is her duty? Does she, with her husband’s blessing, wish to fully explore and experiment in her sexuality?
·       The film appears consistent in condemning strict religious-steeped patriarchal values; it shows the aftermath of what that kind of culture can do to a woman: she dies at the end, perhaps an unintentional martyr or victim of that culture.
·       By the movie’s conclusion, the viewer has to decide: does Bess become the “good girl” she wishes to be? And was it worth the price?
·       What’s the proof that Bess’ sacrifice—her death—had a redemptive purpose and was worthwhile? After all, she dies, so what was accomplished? We see her husband start to improve. This can be interpreted as a victory: she has saved his life with her love.

WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MOVIE’S TITLE?
·       It possibly refers to “not making waves” or upsetting the natural order of things; Bess attempts to break those conventions and expectations.
·       The word “breaking” is important, because she breaks from society and, in the end, her body breaks; and “waves” refers to the seaside community she lives in.

OTHER FILMS BY LARS VON TRIER
·       Europa
·       Dogville
·       Manderlay
·       Antichrist
·       Melancholia

Read more...

Can you ride the "Waves"?

Sunday, January 5, 2014

On January 8, CineVerse will shine its spotlight on “Breaking the Waves” (1996; 159 minutes), directed by Lars von Trier, chosen by Peggy Quinn; Note: due to this film’s long runtime, CineVerse will start promptly at 7 p.m. and conclude no earlier than 10:15 p.m.

Read more...

  © Blogger template Cumulus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP